Executable contract

47 obligations. Over the wire.

The kit knows nothing about your database, framework, or internals. It speaks the binding exactly as an unfamiliar client would.

Run it

A failure points back to the sentence.

Every output line cites the normative section it enforces. That makes a failed implementation test useful feedback about the code—or about language that was not precise enough.

git clone https://github.com/OpenWorkProtocol/owp-code
cd owp-code && npm install

# Use a scratch surface: the kit creates real work.
node conformance/run.ts https://surface.example \
  --operator-token "$OP" \
  --agent-token "$AGENT"

# expected
47/47 obligations met

Coverage

The obligations follow the contract’s pressure points.

Work lifecycle

Creation, atomic claim, assignment filters, events, parking, decisions, completion, and recovery.

Ordering and projections

Total assignment rank, bounded attention, stable keyset cursors, portfolio, work view, and fleet visibility.

Authority

Agent and operator boundaries, scoped grants, project isolation, authorship, and the delegation invariant.

Interoperability

Typed-link round-trip, vocabulary discovery, advertised verbs, revision pins, and normative error behavior.

What counts

Passes, failures, and honest skips.

An obligation that cannot run is reported as not exercised, never quietly counted as a pass. Four authority checks require a surface configured with credentials because open mode has no agent class or invalid token to address.

The reference surface passes all 47 with operator and agent tokens. In open mode it passes 43 and names the four checks it could not exercise.